首页> 外文OA文献 >An evaluation of plastic flow stress models for the simulation of high-temperature and high-strain-rate deformation of metals
【2h】

An evaluation of plastic flow stress models for the simulation of high-temperature and high-strain-rate deformation of metals

机译:塑性流动应力模型的模拟评价   金属的高温和高应变率变形

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Phenomenological plastic flow stress models are used extensively in thesimulation of large deformations of metals at high strain-rates and hightemperatures. Several such models exist and it is difficult to determine theapplicability of any single model to the particular problem at hand. Ideally,the models are based on the underlying (subgrid) physics and therefore do notneed to be recalibrated for every regime of application. In this work wecompare the Johnson-Cook, Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan-Lund, Zerilli-Armstrong,Mechanical Threshold Stress, and Preston-Tonks-Wallace plasticity models. Weuse OFHC copper as the comparison material because it is well characterized.First, we determine parameters for the specific heat model, the equation ofstate, shear modulus models, and melt temperature models. These models areevaluated and their range of applicability is identified. We then compare theflow stresses predicted by the five flow stress models with experimental datafor annealed OFHC copper and quantify modeling errors. Next, Taylor impacttests are simulated, comparison metrics are identified, and the flow stressmodels are evaluated on the basis of these metrics. The material point methodis used for these computations. We observe that the all the models are quiteaccurate at low temperatures and any of these models could be used insimulations. However, at high temperatures and under high-strain-rateconditions, their accuracy can vary significantly.
机译:现象学塑性流应力模型被广泛用于模拟金属在高应变率和高温下的大变形。存在几种这样的模型,并且难以确定任何单个模型对当前特定问题的适用性。理想情况下,模型基于基础(子网格)物理,因此不需要针对每种应用方案进行重新校准。在这项工作中,我们比较了Johnson-Cook,Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan-Lund,Zerilli-Armstrong,机械阈值应力和Preston-Tonks-Wallace可塑性模型。我们使用OFHC铜作为比较材料,因为它具有良好的特性。首先,我们确定比热模型的参数,状态方程,剪切模量模型和熔体温度模型。对这些模型进行了评估,并确定了它们的适用范围。然后,我们将这五个流动应力模型预测的流动应力与退火的OFHC铜的实验数据进行比较,并量化建模误差。接下来,模拟泰勒冲击试验,确定比较指标,并基于这些指标评估流动应力模型。物质点法用于这些计算。我们观察到,所有模型在低温下都非常准确,并且其中任何一个模型都可以用于仿真。但是,在高温和高应变率条件下,其精度可能会有很大差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Banerjee, Biswajit;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号